Annual Achievement Award

Annual Achievement Award

Nomination Guidelines

SELF-NOMINATIONS ARE ALLOWED.

Purpose:
AECT's Annual Achievement Award is presented to an individual or group whose efforts resulted in a significant contribution to the advancement of educational communications and technology. The achievement is defined as high profile usually connected to a public event or announcement. It can be an enhanced or new program or service, a creative or large-scale application of educational technology, a significant publication or production, major changes in planning and practice, and other accomplishments that have occurred usually no more than two years in advance of the award presentation at annual convention.

Eligibility:
• Nominee may be an individual or a group.  If an individual within a group, the role of the nominee should be specified.  
• The nominee(s) need not be a member of AECT.
• Nominee cannot be a current AECT Board Member or AECT Awards Committee member.
• Achievement  should be recent or within two years of the presentation.  
• Award may be given to the same individual or group more than once.

Review Criteria:
Nature, impact and quality of the specific achievement.
Quality of support from additional references or contributors to the nomination.  

(See evaluation rubric below)

Selection:
Nominations are coordinated, reviewed and recipients selected initially by the AECT Awards Committee which forwards names of award recipients to the AECT Executive Committee for confirmation. An award review sub-committee led by a member of the AECT Awards Committee and comprised of award committee members and non-members including a previous award recipient forwards recommendations to the Chair.  No more than 2 awards are presented annually.

Nomination Procedures:
To prepare a nomination, click the online nomination form displayed below. Before entering and submitting, review form and then have all information prepared in advance. Include any additional materials as directed. The nomination's supporting comments should include the specific achievement being honored and the impact or anticipated impact in the field of educational technology. Include, the role the nominee played in this achievement.  If a procedural or technical issue arises contact AECT headquarters or the award contact listed below for alternative submission options. Comments from at least one and up to a preferred three references is requested. Required contact information for the references includes name and email address along with additional information. Once submitted, an email will be sent to each reference requesting comments via a link in the message.  

Nomination Form: Submit nomination

Nature of Award: Plaque

Presentation: Awards ceremony during General Session at the AECT annual convention

Funding and Support: AECT

Nominations due by: April 18, 2025

Award Management on behalf of AECT: AECT Awards Committee

Contact : AECT Awards Committee, aect@aect.org

Rubric for Evaluating Nominations

Criteria

Exemplary (4)

Accomplished (3)

Proficient (2)

Emerging (1)

Impact of Achievement

The achievement is highly significant, bringing major advancement and visibility to the field.

The achievement has made an impactful contribution, moderately advancing the field.

The achievement shows potential for impact with some positive influence on the field.

The achievement has limited scope and minimal visible impact on the field.

Innovation and Creativity

The achievement reflects a high level of innovation and creativity, setting new standards in the field.

The achievement demonstrates innovation and creativity, aligning with current trends.

The achievement has moderate creativity, building on existing methods or ideas.

The achievement lacks innovation and is largely based on traditional or existing practices.

Quality of Support

Reference letters strongly endorse the nominee, providing specific examples, evidence or data supporting the effectiveness of the achievement, contribution and impact.

Reference letters provide adequate support with examples or evidence of contributions and achievements.

Reference letters offer limited examples of contribution and impact.

Reference letters provide minimal support or examples of impact.

Recency and Relevance

Achievement occurred within the past two years and addresses critical, timely issues.

Achievement is recent, addressing relevant issues.

Achievement is somewhat recent but has limited direct relevance to current issues in the field.

Achievement is outdated or lacks relevance to the current state of the field.